|
Search by Category
Happy
NEW YEAR!!!
Home
Boston Nightclubs
Boston Nightlife Pics
Nightclub Chicks
HOT Nightclub Photos
Boston Irish Pubs
Faneuil Hall Boston
NH Nightclubs
RI Nightclub News
Bachelorette Parties
Boston College Guide
Weekly Newsletter
Boston Party Bus
Latin Nightclubs
Boston Jazz Clubs
Boston Radio
Nightclub Links
Free Stuff VIP Passes
18 Plus Nightclubs
Under 21 Nightclubs
Boston Visitors Guide
Nightclub
DJs
Singles Travel Deals
Route One Saugus MA
Site Map & Directory
Contact
Advertise on BNN
Legal
Disclaimer
E-mail

Future Classic NYE
2009



NYE Boston CLICK HERE
Boston Strippers
Boston Female Exotic Dancers
Boston Red Sox Tickets
Fenway Park Tickets

NYE Boston CLICK HERE

Rawkstar DJ Entertainment

Carlo Leoni Productions

BMW SALES SPECIALS

Herb Chambers Ford

Herb Chambers

Smart Car Boston

Carlo
Leoni Productions

Boston Pub Crawls Bachelorette Parties

Single
Man's Guide
to
Great Women

Aveda Salon
Boston

Phantom Gourmet

Nightclub Chicks

2008
Election News

WaterWorks Boston

Nightlife
Newsletter

Chinatown
Boston Restaurant Guide

Phantom Gourmet

Gay & Lesbian Boston

Sexy Bartenders
Boston Sports Bars

Boston Nightclubs
on MySpace


Rhode Island
Nightclubs

Manix Condoms

Boston Concert Tickets
|
May 30, 2007 2:31:52 PM - Boston
Phoenix Newspaper


Support the Cape Wind Project
CLICK HERE
There’s a foul wind
blowing off Cape Cod.
The
clean-energy project known as Cape Wind makes more
sense than ever, what with the mess in the Middle
East and the earth getting warmer by the minute. But
resistance to the proposed wind-farm — which would
place 130 windmills in Nantucket Sound and provide
up to 75 percent of the Cape’s energy at any given
time — proves that it really isn’t easy being green.
Since Cape Wind was first proposed in 2001, the
project has made plenty of powerful enemies (see the
sidebar “Enemies in High Places”), including Ted
Kennedy, his nephew Robert, and a host of other
wealthy Cape Codders who don’t want their beachfront
views blighted or their sailing waters cluttered.
(Opponents also cite concern for the local fishing
industry and avian and marine habitats.)
Now the
ongoing fight over Cape Wind has yielded a media
controversy. Following the release of a new book
(published on May 7) that paints the project’s
opponents in an exceedingly unflattering light, some
wind-farm supporters are accusing the Cape and
Island stations of WGBH, Boston’s
public-broadcasting behemoth, of de facto
censorship. Whatever you make of this accusation, it
shows just how charged the Cape Wind battle has
become — and highlights just how much clout the
project’s opponents actually have.
Conspiracy of silence
Allegations of a media blackout surrounding Cape
Wind: Money, Celebrity, Class, Politics, and the
Battle for Our Energy Future on Nantucket Sound
(Public Affairs) started with a reading that Wendy
Williams, who co-authored the book with Robert
Whitcomb, gave at a Cape Cod bookstore, Chatham’s
Cabbages and Kings, on May 16.
Before
Williams’s appearance, Jack Moye — the husband of
the bookstore’s owner and a wind-farm supporter —
tried to drum up advance publicity for the event on
WCAI, WGBH’s Cape affiliate. (WCAI shares staff and
programming with WNAN, the Nantucket station, and
WZAI, which serves Martha’s Vineyard; in radio
parlance, the latter two stations are “repeaters.”)
In early May, Moye says, he mentioned the book and
the upcoming reading to Elizabeth White, the
reporter in charge of WCAI’s wind-farm coverage:
Moye says White told him she was eager to read the
book and stopped by the store to pick up an advance
copy.
A few
days later, Moye says, he hadn’t heard back from
White. So he contacted Georgia McDonald, WCAI’s
corporate-sales director, thinking that a pledge
might help his cause. McDonald subsequently visited
the store and discussed Cape Wind with a
staffer. According to Moye — who didn’t witness the
exchange — McDonald said “one of the people at the
station had looked at the book and thought it was
too pointed to bear mention. I don’t think she
actually used the word ‘biased,’ but that’s what it
turned out to be.”
Nothing
too remarkable so far. After all, reporters take a
pass on stories all the time. Furthermore, Williams
and Whitcomb’s book is biased — though it’s also
informative and entertaining. Jim Gordon, the man
behind the Cape Wind project, is consistently
depicted as a visionary underdog, and the
lionization of Gordon can be a bit much. In
contrast, the project’s opponents — including
Kennedy, whose family compound at Hyannisport is the
stuff of legend — are cast as a bunch of rich
hypocrites who’ve put their own needs ahead of the
common good.
That
said, a few additional details complicate the
picture. Consider:
●
One of WGBH’s board members is the brother of a
prominent wind-farm opponent.
David Koch, whose $12 billion placed him 49th on
Forbes’ latest ranking of the world’s
billionaires, sits on WGBH’s board of directors. He
also helps fund the PBS program Nova, which is
produced by WGBH. Meanwhile, Bill Koch — the
businessman, Museum of Fine Arts
benefactor/exhibitionist, and former America’s Cup
winner whose net worth is a mere $1.3 billion — is a
leader of the Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound,
the major anti-wind-farm group. Bill Koch has
reportedly spent more than one million dollars of
his own fortune on the anti-wind-farm cause.
●
WGBH’s Cape affiliates have a working
partnership with the Cape Cod Times, the
editorial page of which staunchly opposes Cape Wind.
Times editors regularly appear on WCAI
to discuss stories in that day’s paper. During Cliff
Schechtman’s 10-year tenure as editor, which ended
in 2005, several critics (including former
Phoenix writer Mark Jurkowitz) accused the
Times of allowing its editorial stance to
influence its news coverage. In 2005, for example,
former Times reporter Jack Coleman wrote
that Schechtman “won’t send his reporters anywhere
that they might find people who overcame their
initial opposition to windmills off their coast.”
Wind-farm supporters agree that the Times’
news coverage has improved since Paul Pronovost
replaced Schechtman as editor. But publisher Peter
Meyer — who lives in Osterville, Ground Zero for
Cape Wind opposition, and does not receive
flattering treatment in Cape Wind — still
holds the paper’s purse strings.
Boston Phoenix Thursday, June 21, 2007
The local ProgBloggers might not like it, but Frank Phillips has a
perfectly valid point in today's Globe. Deval
Patrick's fundraising activities absolutely should
be watched and monitored closely, and it's up to the
Governor to demonstrate, by his actions, that the
money doesn't affect the governing.
That's the case, in my opinion, with any powerful
public figure, but especially with Patrick. Why? For
one thing, as Phillips points out, it certainly has
the appearance of deeds not matching rhetoric. But
more importantly, because of the seeming inverse
relationship with some of his donors. That is to
say, one expects people to donate to officeholders
who are on their side of the issues -- if I'm a fan
of low state income taxes, of course I would have
been inclined to give to someone like Mitt Romney
who was in my corner. But when people, or groups of
people, give to an officeholder who is up to that
point working against their interests, the public
has a right to wonder whether they're trying to use
that money, or the access that money brings, to get
what they want.
When Patrick raises a bunch of money from NStar,
it's certainly worth noting. It's also worth noting
that he just raised a truckload from attorneys at
Mintz Levin, which lobbies state government, and a
little chunk from Arbella Insurance execs.
Sunshine is the great disinfectant, as they say.
There's nothing wrong with Patrick raising money
from any of these folks. But it's vital that the
press and the public pay attention to it.
Who’s looking at you, kid?
March 2, 2007 5:38:04 PM
Students, be warned:
the college of your choice may be watching you, and will more
than likely be keeping an eye on you once you enter the hallowed
campus gates. America’s institutions of higher education are
increasingly monitoring students’ activity online and
scrutinizing profiles, not only for illegal behavior, but also
for what they deem to be inappropriate speech.
Contrary to popular
misconceptions, the speech codes, censorship, and double
standards of the culture-wars heyday of the ’80s and ’90s are
alive and kicking, and they are now colliding with the latest
explosion of communication technology. Sites like Facebook and MySpace are
becoming the largest battleground yet for student free speech.
Whatever campus administrators’ intentions (and they are often
mixed), students need to know that online jokes, photos, and
comments can get them in hot water, no matter how effusively
their schools claim to respect free speech. The long arm of
campus officialdom is reaching far beyond the bounds of its
buildings and grounds and into the shadowy realm of cyberspace.
A scary
experience
Consider the case of Justin
Park, a Korean-American student at Johns Hopkins University in
Baltimore. An intelligent and driven young man — smart enough to
start at Hopkins at 15 — Justin began his junior year this past
fall. But due to charges of racial harassment stemming from a
party invitation he posted on Facebook, he was suspended from
school this past November.
As social chair of
his fraternity, Justin composed an
invitation to a “Halloween in the Hood” party, one of many
intentionally un-PC themed parties the fraternity had thrown
over the years (others included a “White Trash Trailer Bash” and
a “Catholic Schoolgirl Party”). Taking his cues from
Chapelle’s Show and MTV videos, he crafted the invite’s
call, listing gangsta rapper Ice-T as the party’s host and
asking partygoers to “come dressed in yo’ bomb ass Halloween
costume or git smok’d.” It was an awkward attempt, to be sure,
but Justin thought it was the kind of ironic humor that his
peers would recognize as making fun of himself and the party as
much as anything else.
Justin posted the
party invitation on Facebook. After all, every one of his
friends was a member of Facebook. Come to think of it, so was
pretty much the entire student body. And that’s where the
problem started.
Justin’s friends
weren’t the only ones who saw his invitation. In fact, the
university’s director of Greek Affairs regularly monitored
Facebook activity — and he was not amused. Calling the invite
offensive, he asked Justin to take it down. He did. But once the
invite was removed, people kept e-mailing Justin, asking if the
party was still on.
So Justin put up
another invite the next day, making sure to remove what he
thought to be the offensive language. In fact, he hammed it up:
right next to the call for attendees to wear “copious amounts of
so-called ‘bling bling ice ice,’ ” he wrote that he didn’t
“condone or advocate racism, fascism, communism, consumerism,
capitalism, terrorism, organism(s), sexism, womanism, jism, or
any other –ism’s,” but referred to Baltimore as an “HIV pit” and
made mocking references to O.J. Simpson and Johnnie Cochran. As
far as Justin and his friends were concerned, however, the
invite was an obvious joke.
The party was held
the next night, and it was well-attended. Not all who came,
however, enjoyed themselves. According to the Baltimore Sun,
members of the Black Student Union attended the party, and to
many of them the party was a direct affront, a celebration of
negative racial stereotypes. Black Student Union members took
particular offense to a skeleton pirate dangling from a noose,
which they perceived as an obvious symbol of lynching. (The
university later concluded, however, that the skeleton had been
meant to represent the motion picture Pirates of the
Caribbean.)
A week later, Justin
received a letter from John Hopkins’s associate dean of
students, informing him that he’d been charged with violating
university policy because of the language used in his
invitations. Specifically, Johns Hopkins charged Justin with
“failing to respect the rights of others and to refrain from
behavior that impairs the university’s purpose or its reputation
in the community,” violating the “university’s anti-harassment
policy,” “failure to comply with the directions of a university
administrator,” “conduct or a pattern of conduct that harasses a
person or a group,” and “intimidation.”
Although they sound
official, these quasi-legal charges wouldn’t stand for a second
in a real court. According to a 2003 statement by the US
Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights (OCR), the
legal standard for “harassment” is behavior that is
“sufficiently serious (i.e., severe, persistent, or pervasive)
as to limit or deny a student’s ability to participate in or
benefit from an educational program.” The OCR, in fact, issued
the 2003 statement to address the rampant abuse of “harassment”
charges to punish un-PC speech. Justin’s speech, however obtuse,
was still well within the bounds of expression protected by the
First Amendment. As Gregory Kane, an (African-American) English
professor at Johns Hopkins wrote in an editorial column for the
Baltimore Sun: “We’ll just keep saying it until the
idea sinks in: There is no right, constitutional or otherwise,
to not be offended.”
Monday, December 08, 2008
We're hard at work over here putting together photo, video,
and good old written recaps of last night's Boston Music Awards, but for
now we figured that you might want to know who the winners were.
Click here for lists of all the nominees, and be sure to check back later on
today and all week long for continued coverage. Oh - and congrats to all
victorious parties.
Outstanding Tribute Act of the Year
Joshua Tree
Outstanding International Music Act of the Year
Zili Misik
Outstanding Folk Act of the Year
Miss Tess
Outstanding Blues Act of the Year
David Maxwell
Outstanding Singer-Songwriter Act of the Year
Marissa Nadler
Outstanding Jazz Act of the Year
Grace Kelly
Outstanding Americana Act of the Year
Girls, Guns and Glory
Outstanding Punk Act of the Year
Big D and the Kids Table
Outstanding Metal / Hardcore Act of the Year
Doomriders
Outstanding DJ / Electronica Act of the Year
Baltimoroder
Outstanding Pop / R&B Act of the Year
JADA
Outstanding Hip-Hop Act of the Year
Termanology
Outstanding Rock Act of the Year
Wild Light
Best College Band
Bearstronaught
Humanitarian of the Year
Chad Stokes (State Radio)
Unsung Hero Award
Billy Beard (Face to Face)
Best Song of the Year – Local
Great Bandini / “One and One”
Best Song of the Year – National
Juliana Hatfield / “This Lonely Love”
Producer of the Year – Hip-Hop/R&B
Matty Trump
Producer of the Year – Rock/Pop
Ed Valauskas
Male Vocalist of the Year – Local
Eli Reed
Male Vocalist of the Year – National
Al Barr (Dropkick Murphys)
Female Vocalist of the Year – Local
Sarah Borges
Female Vocalist of the Year – National
Amanda Palmer
Outstanding Live Act of the Year
The Camp
Best New Act of the Year
The Low Anthem
Album of the Year – Local
Akrobatik / Absolute Value
Album of the Year – National
Amanda Palmer / Who Killed Amanda Palmer
Act of the Year – Local
Girls, Guns & Glory
Act of the Year – National
New Kids on the Block

Boston Italian North End Restaurant Guide

Boston Phoenix Newspaper "Talking Politics"
|
|